- Main
- Society, Politics & Philosophy - Anthropology
- Power, politics, and tradition in the...
Power, politics, and tradition in the Mongol empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran
Michael HopeJak bardzo podobała Ci się ta książka?
Jaka jest jakość pobranego pliku?
Pobierz książkę, aby ocenić jej jakość
Jaka jest jakość pobranych plików?
This study provides a new interpretation of how political authority was conceived and transmitted in the Early Mongol Empire (1227-1259) and its successor state in the Middle East, the Ikhanate (1258-1335). Authority within the Mongol Empire was intimately tied to the character of its founder, Chinggis Khan, whose reign served as an idealized model for the exercise of legitimate authority amongst his political successors.
Yet Chinggis Khan's legacy was interpreted differently by the various factions within his army. In the years after his death, two distinct political traditions emerged within the Mongol Empire, the collegial and the patrimonialist. Each of these streams represented the economic and political interests of different groups within the Mongol Empire, respectively, the military aristocracy and the central government. The supporters of both streams claimed to adhere to the ideal of Chinggisid rule, but their different statuses within the Mongol community led them to hold divergent views of what constituted legitimate political authority.
Michael Hope's study details the origin of, and the differences between, these two streams of tradition; analyzing the role that these streams played in the political development of the Mongol Empire and the lkhanate; and assessing the role that ideological tension between the two streams played in the events leading up to the division of the Ilkhanate. Hope demonstrates that the policy and identity of both the Early Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate were defined by the conflict between these competing streams of Chinggisid authority.
Yet Chinggis Khan's legacy was interpreted differently by the various factions within his army. In the years after his death, two distinct political traditions emerged within the Mongol Empire, the collegial and the patrimonialist. Each of these streams represented the economic and political interests of different groups within the Mongol Empire, respectively, the military aristocracy and the central government. The supporters of both streams claimed to adhere to the ideal of Chinggisid rule, but their different statuses within the Mongol community led them to hold divergent views of what constituted legitimate political authority.
Michael Hope's study details the origin of, and the differences between, these two streams of tradition; analyzing the role that these streams played in the political development of the Mongol Empire and the lkhanate; and assessing the role that ideological tension between the two streams played in the events leading up to the division of the Ilkhanate. Hope demonstrates that the policy and identity of both the Early Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate were defined by the conflict between these competing streams of Chinggisid authority.
Rok:
2016
Wydanie:
First edition
Wydawnictwo:
Oxford University Press
Język:
english
Strony:
272
ISBN 10:
0198768591
ISBN 13:
9780198768593
Plik:
PDF, 1.86 MB
Twoje tagi:
IPFS:
CID , CID Blake2b
english, 2016
Plik zostanie dostarczony na Twój e-mail w ciągu 1-5 minut.
W ciągu 1-5 minut plik zostanie dostarczony na Twoje konto Telegram.
Uwaga: Upewnij się, że połączyłeś swoje konto z botem Z-Library Telegram.
W ciągu 1-5 minut plik zostanie dostarczony na Twoje urządzenie Kindle.
Uwaga: musisz zweryfikować każdą książkę, którą chcesz wysłać na swój Kindle. Sprawdź swoją skrzynkę pocztową pod kątem e-maila weryfikacyjnego z Amazon Kindle Support.
Trwa konwersja do
Konwersja do nie powiodła się
Korzyści ze statusu premium
- Wyślij do e-czytników
- Zwiększony limit pobierania
- Konwertuj pliki
- Więcej wyników wyszukiwania
- Inne korzyści